The upcoming US presidential election is set to be a pivotal moment for US-Israel relations, as former President Donald Trump warns that Israel’s future is at risk if Vice President Kamala Harris wins the White House.
Speaking to Jewish donors in Las Vegas, Trump asserted that a Harris presidency would “totally abandon” Israel and lead to “terrorist armies” waging war against the Jewish state.
The statements have sparked a heated debate about the potential foreign policy direction under Harris, particularly concerning her stance on Israel and the broader Middle East.
Trump’s claims Israel’s security is at stake
In his address to the Republican Jewish Coalition, Trump claimed that Israel would cease to exist under a Harris administration.
He further argued that Harris would “abandon” Israel, leaving it vulnerable to attacks.
According to Trump, such abandonment would encourage “terrorist armies” to “drive Jews out of the Holy Land.”
He also highlighted his own administration’s actions, such as banning refugees from “terror-infested areas” and arresting “pro-Hamas thugs” who vandalise government property, as measures that safeguarded Israel.
Trump also targeted Jewish Americans who support the Democratic Party, questioning their loyalty to Israel.
“Who are the 50 percent of Jewish people that are voting for these people that hate Israel?” Trump asked, further adding to his critique of Harris and her supporters. His remarks echo his past statements about US Jews and their voting patterns, which have often sparked controversy.
Harris’ stance on Israel and Palestine
Vice President Kamala Harris has consistently stated her support for Israel as a secure, democratic homeland for the Jewish people.
Her position on Israel-Palestine relations has been more nuanced compared to Trump’s hardline approach.
While Harris, like President Joe Biden, has maintained strong support for Israel, she has also emphasised the importance of acknowledging Palestinian suffering.
She has criticised the high civilian toll in Gaza and expressed a desire to avoid being “silent” on these issues.
Harris’ campaign spokesperson, Morgan Finkelstein, responded to Trump’s comments by reiterating Harris’ commitment to fighting anti-Semitism and her long-standing support for Israel.
Finkelstein also pointed out Trump’s history of controversial remarks and associations with far-right figures, which could be seen as undermining his claims of being a staunch ally of Israel.
Reactions to Trump’s remarks
Trump’s statements come at a time when US university campuses have seen a surge in protests over Israel’s actions in Gaza.
This has led to accusations of anti-Semitism from some quarters, while others argue that these accusations are being used to suppress legitimate criticism of Israeli policies.
Trump has promised to cancel funding for universities that, in his view, spread “anti-Semitic propaganda” if re-elected.
The rhetoric surrounding the election could significantly impact future US-Israel relations.
Harris’ more balanced approach could lead to a policy shift that focuses on a two-state solution and humanitarian considerations for Palestinians, in contrast to Trump’s unequivocal support for Israel.
The upcoming election will thus likely shape not only the domestic political landscape but also international diplomacy in the Middle East.
If elected, Harris may adopt a more diplomatic approach towards the Israel-Palestine conflict, potentially reopening dialogue channels that have been strained under previous administrations.
This could involve a reassessment of US aid and support strategies in the region, taking into account both security concerns and human rights issues.
While Trump has positioned himself as the ultimate protector of Israel, Harris’ stance could appeal to voters looking for a more nuanced foreign policy that balances security with humanitarian efforts.
The post Trump tells Jewish donors Harris presidency would mean end of Israel appeared first on Invezz
